Thursday, January 20

Leeds United 1-3 Arsenal ... Top four quality shown as Arsenal mirror Spurs replay

Nasri ran Arsenal's game. I got sick of this sight last night!
Sat in traffic on the way to the ground, the early underlying optimism about the tie I'd garnered from some abject Arsenal performances of late - including rolling over at struggling Ipswich - was partially quashed as firstly the team news revealed Becchio didn't make the squad, and secondly Samir Nasri was going to start the game. Along with Sagna returning from suspension, these factors really did combine to cause us a massive hindrance all night. I thought to myself in the days leading upto the game that we had a chance if Wenger did start with either the team that we played at the Emirates or the team that played Ipswich, and I never envisaged him starting his best, and probably the Premier League's current best player - Nasri. When the team news was announced I did have a feeling of 'Spurs' about me - we did admirably away but you don't usually get a second chance against a class outfit.

What this shows us though, is that Wenger realised that we had enough to cause his side trouble and that alone was something to take from the two ties and shows where we currently stand in English football. It really is a positive sign that he had to use, and therefore risk Samir Nasri from the start as well as trying to put pay to any possible comeback on our behalf by bringing on his next two best players, Fabregas and the spearhead of the club's forwards that is Robin Van Persie.

The game quickly settled into a pattern of Arsenal passing that we managed to stifle so much better away at the Emirates. It could be said that we didn't close them down effectively enough, this sometimes was the case. It was made more difficult however by their defence-bewildering movement that they desperately lacked in the first leg. Their usual passing and movement mixed with invention was on show, which it definitely wasn't at the Emirates. Nasri, as expected, was the focal point of everything they did. He had almost a free role, drifting everywhere behind the front three when they were on the attack, picking the ball up from deep when in the defensive phase, and bursting through on goal when the opportunity arose, as he showed for their 1st. He was impossible to track, impossible to tackle and, I believe, was the reason they seemed more potent. Their midfield and forwards when building an attack over ran us, their know-how, movement and athleticism showed - but again the spark was from Nasri's inclusion in the 11. He was involved in everything they did.

What we should have done was get in amongst them, in their faces and put the boot in, so to speak. One early crunch in on Nasri could have made all the difference. It doesn't have to be a studs up, Wenger-moan-inducing cruncher, just a "let him know you're there" kind of tackle. Annoyingly, we seemed to prod a foot in with arms in the air, just in case we tripped an Arsenal man, rather than going into tackles with more purpose. To beat teams with such class hard tackling is almost a must unfortunately for Arsene.

This doesn't mean I thought we lacked spirit and commitment however, because we certainly did not. Jonny Howson was playing like a man possessed and showed a spirit that revealed just how much he wants the club - his club - to impress in these kind of ties. Johnson was similarly playing with his heart on his sleeve. The standout performer for me was Gradel. We all know "he's here, he's there, he's every F****** where" but last night he took the micky. He was immense. Even in the 90th he turned both Sagna and Djourou only to get tripped. He was full of energy, passion and showed buckets of ability, he impressed massively and it's pleasing to see just how far he's come.

The obvious lack of Becchio was frustrating and clear to see. Despite Paynter being in a similar mold, at least in Grayson's eyes, he showed just how far from Luciano his game currently is. Becchio looked far more assured, and less out of place against Spurs, "Scum", Arsenal and Liverpool. He won more of the ball, he put himself about more, and most importantly when the ball was at his feet he used it far better, and held it up more intelligently and when needed. Against an admittedly quicker Arsenal defence and starting eleven than probably most in the country, he looked like he was dragging an anchor with him. I could forgive some of the gulf in class, after all it was a Premier League team, but a few times he didn't seem to me as if he was going all out, like the rest of the team were. I'm not certain, and not trying to accuse, but the fans around me seemed to agree, there were several long balls where he left an Arsenal man a free header, despite being two yards away - and he was in the team to challenge in the air for us. He spent a lot of time ambling. Most annoyingly, when the ball was slide across the face of goal, into his path, he didn't even slide in. Again, I'm not certain it would have been a goal, and I'm trying not to be overly critical but surely, you throw yourself into that cross? Becchio certainly does, and Paynter left me feeling he has a lot left to prove - as Davide came on and did admirably in his place, as well.

(I'm not ruling him out and trying to be unfair to him, he hasn't had much game time and was playing against Arsenal here and to be honest, I probably expected too much of him. None of us truly know his capabilities, but currently, Becchio is a class above.)

Anyway... the game, starting with the defence. We seemed solid as we could be against the players in question, though their second and third goals came from small lapses, in my opinion. These lapses are more likely to be forced against class opposition and play however, and they didn't overly worry me. The first was a good ball into Nasri, maybe a better foot in but as he strode into the penalty area to score this would have been dangerous. It was class play from their difference maker on the night. Their second should have been closed down, no doubt about it. The originally good clearance from O'Brien went, unluckily, straight to Sagna, who was allowed to take two or three strides forward unchallenged as two Leeds men stood off, and probably unsighted Kasper if anything. Their third, Parker strode out of position into the centre of midfield, misplaced it, allowing a break into the void he left behind. Not a criticism here really though, as we were going for the equaliser. It was more pleasing to see the endeavour. Unfortunately for us, class players punish such things. Leigh Bromby completely lost Van Persie in that goal, though. Bruce and O'Brien again impressed as a partnership, and both looked assured.

I do sound critical here but we were pleasingly solid (realistically we couldn't have expected any more). I think Kasper had less to do than at the Emirates, even with Arsenal fielding a better side. Kasper made one absolute wonder-save from another good Chamakh run, he ran unmarked a couple of times in the first leg an he is noted for aerial threat. The save was not only full stretch and almost point blank, but he pushed the ball up and out of the danger area towards the edge of the box. Incredible.



In midfield, aside from perhaps being a little harder in the tackle and quicker to press, we did admirably. When we did press we marked every man and forced an error several times, but Nasri's invention and talents allowed play to be spread often faster than we could manage defensively. We did impressively, and they did the best they could. Because of the amount of defending we had to do, we didn't see Snodgrass as far up the pitch as we would probably have liked, taking on a full back but when he did get forward he made good use of the ball, linking up with Connolly well as we've seen often this season. "Who needs Cesc Fabregas, we've got Rob Snodgrass" was a good call.

Howson was brilliant, he showed excellent composure on the ball, created space for himself and used the ball wisely. He was the nearest thing to Nasri we currently could manage, and several times went on the break and created opportunities. Most notably, at 1-2 he so nearly rolled Max in for a one on one, were it not for Djourou's toe things could have been very different. The assist for Johnson was neat, and most impressively he managed to physically compete with, and outwit Premier League (including a Brazilian international) midfielders, turning them (sometimes two at a time), shielding the ball and pinging a pass off. For me, an exciting glimpse of what Howson might become as a footballer given time.

Johnson put in a good shift and scored a world class goal. It might be just me but despite him scoring two long range efforts this season, including one on Saturday against Scunny, I still get the "don't shoot" voice in my head when the ball is rolled to him. Despite flying off his boot, time slowed down as it arrowed into the top corner, the only place that would have beaten their 6ft 5" keeper. What a goal it was. The best I've seen for ages at Elland Road from a Leeds man.

Sanchez did OK. I can't say anything more than that. A few times he ran at the Arsenal defence but his pace and ability isn't enough to worry players like that, at this moment in time. It's a different story in the Championship for him, however as he seems every bit a bright prospect. He seemed fairly anonymous, but didn't play poorly by any stretch. It was a good effort. He managed far better at the Emirates.

Max was brilliant. I've said it above but he was Leeds personified last night. He is really developing and looked at home taking on top drawer defenders, making Sagna and others look silly on more than one occasion. He, like Howson, showed glimpses against better players of what he may become in the future. 

Up front, I've mentioned Paynter, who, I repeat wasn't bad and I'm by no means scapegoating but we missed Luciano it can't be argued against. I am glad that Simon decided to give Davide a go ahead of McCormack and probably leaving Paynter on. He did well, some class touches and turns and was unlucky not to score with his first touch.

Tactically, the team looked far better when we reverted to a 4-4-2 with Gradel playing off Paynter where possible. We needed the pace of Max on the counter as the long ball hold up play, making use of Paynter and what should have been an advancing midfield in the 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation we started with and have used recently with success didn't pay off early on. The players adapted well to the change of outlook which is pleasing, as was Simon's continued willingness never to lie down - playing two strikers with two wingers at times when going forward.

O'Brien going off injured seemed bad at first, but apparently is only a tight hamstring, hopefully more precautionary.

Arsenal did have too much quality and did play very well, in the end and perhaps inevitably. But as two teams I don't believe we were played off the park by any means. We put in a tireless shift as a group and competed well, fashioning equally good opportunities as those that Arsenal managed - we each slid the ball across the goal mouth twice for example, with a striker narrowly missing out on a tap in. It was a performance to be proud of again and shows good progress. 

Nasri was certainly their key (just look at the News Now articles leading with Nasri in the title) in the change we saw in their performance from the Emirates (along with Sagna - an improvement on Eboue) rather than what they're coming out and saying was "hunger". Putting the current form player in England on against a Championship side is bound to have such an effect. Wenger knew this, respected us, and played him - getting his result without injury so credit to him for risking it and showing that respect that the majority of Premier League managers seem to currently lack. 

Excellent photo from kf_leeds on flikr
On their official site's headline, I've just read a Twitter post from a delusional fan: "Our football at times was out of this world". All very well and good against a Championship side, and without bitterness, an Arsenal friend who attended the game agreed with what I thought - They make too many wrong decisions and misplace the ball too often. Their goals came from quick incisive moves with few passes - breakaways really. The more they do this the better, as the greater the number of passes they strung together, the more likely we looked to get behind the ball and snuff out an opportunity by just stepping in and intercepting, or the more likely they looked to misplace the ball - which did happen fairly often - enough times to take note at least. They aren't out of the woods or out from under the microscope just yet. The mere fact they needed their big guns - bringing two World Cup finalists off the bench to see the game out and starting their form player, should be of slight concern to them, surely? And their real tests will come in the Premier League and Champions League. On the flip-side to that comment, it should be massively heartening for our club.

The Support
Fantastic, a classic Elland Road evening atmosphere. Roll on nights like these. ITV again made Arsenal sound loud on their coverage, lacking microphones in our areas a la the Spurs replay and no doubt due to the ITV chant we love so dearly. The truth is, the sang when 2 goals clear and after the scored. Other than that when they did chime up the Elland Road faithful mocked as they were that quiet the whole evening, despite a good performance.

Man of the Match
Again, everyone put in a tireless shift but the standout man was Max Gradel. He epitomised Leeds and what the fans love players to do last night - he managed to mix his work ethic and tirelessness with great talent - and that was most pleasing.

22 Comments:

Anonymous said...

As a Gooner, I would like to praise you for a very good and fair report.

You played v.well in both games and the ex-Arsenal youth team youngster, Bradley Johnson's, goal was the best of the ties!

Leeds have a great history and it would be good to see you back in the Premiership. (Can you ditch Bates tho'?)

Anonymous said...

I agree. As another gooner I also respect Leeds and its history. I hope u come back to the Premier League, so that we can beat u again (hopefully next season). LOL

Sean said...

Thanks mate, I tried to make it sound like you deserved to win, which is true, whilst offering a perspective on a few views i've seen hinting at a corner turned for your lot - also while showing my annoyance at Nasri playing against us :D

Yeh normally those end up in the stands. Up until a few weeks ago I think I read a stat that said 4% of his shots went in this season, and he had the most shots in the league/our team. Grayson said "Bradley hits those all the time in training ... and they end up in Wetherby"...

Erm regarding Bates, I think currently he's doing a fair job to be honest. What I really don't want a return to is seemingly risky and unfinance-able spending like what seems to be going on a leicester currently...

Sean said...

Any thoughts on Arshavin? Odd to see such a class player in such a rut.

JJ Pittman 40 year gooner and forever said...

My wife thought he must be sick with his runny nose. Followed him in the UEFA cup run with Zenit a few years back and the 4 goal game at Anfield was great.
He started every game earlier this season and had a lot of assists. He never did check back a lot on defense, but seems to be just slower enough this season to get free like he used to. Still has the instincts and would love to see him pot a few. Not worried about the wry smiles, that's just his way.
Thanks for the very honest and thorough analysis.

Anonymous said...

SharkeySure - Gooner.

Quality read that. Very fair except that you didn't mention my own love child - Alex Song, whom Strachan described on ITV as the best DM in the Prem.

Gradel's a talent for sure, along with Howson and Snodgrass. Hopefully you can keep hold of all three and they don't fall prey to the lure of bigger bucks but less playing time at another club.

Overall, very impressed with Leeds over two legs, and good to see you doing so well without Beckford. Becchio was a decent sidekick to JB, and has taken to his new leading light role very well.

Fingers crossed that you guys keep hold of Simon Grayson too. Decent player, great manager, but always been a decent bloke.

Sean said...

Thanks for the input SharkySure. Yeh, Song was solid and effective at breaking up our counters. Positionally he was a beast. Should have mentioned that.

You're definately right about us needing to hold onto our talents - I feel we should be able to unless a sure fire top 10 Prem club comes looking. Is a Wigan, Wolves or Blackburn a massive step, when we're challenging for promotion ourselves?

Luckily we don't need to sell as we make money and I believe the players have seen Delph and Beckford struggle and thought twice. Becchio committed for another 3 and a half years recently so the signs are good.

Cheers again for the read and the compliments.

Anonymous said...

London

I can't understand why you don't have more comments with a quality report like that.

oliver said...

sean, you posted on highbury house under the match report i wrote for rico - thanks for sharing your report with us.

before i sat down to write the report last night, i had it in my mind to mention becchio's absence and how it negatively affected leeds - unfortunately, that was lost in a sea of other thoughts. but let me say it here that it was evident that leeds lacked that extra without him - i could certainly see him capitalizing on the chances that fell to paynter and somma.

i thought rico summed it up best when she said that your window of opportunity was the original tie at the ems. we probably should have lost that one, but theo and cesc got us out of jail. that it took cesc and robin's introduction to finally get our third goal speaks volumes about leeds committment and effort.

you asked for thoughts on arshavin. i think it is a combination of things - confidence is the biggest right now. last season, when we had literally no fit strikers, arsene played him up front, alone, and he took a battering. unsurprisigly, he did not score too many goals then. he started this season well - winning goal at ewood park comes immediately to mind - but lost his way around november and then lost his starting berth. since then, he has either been a sub, or a second choice starter when theo is rested, and i think he has been struggling in this role. elements in the emirates crowd have been on his back about a lack of effort (particularly on the defensive side), but i saw nothing wrong with his effort last night. confidence seems to be his biggest issue, and i hope he can get a scrappy goal to hopefully open the floodgates. on his day, he is a genius and brings so much to the side when in form...

i heard grayson's post-match on 5 live (podcast) and he suggested that they will use some of the proceeds from these ties to strengthen for the promotion push - who would you like to see him bring in?

btw, i enjoyed reading your report...

Sean said...

Thanks very much oliver. Regarding Arshavin, the thing that annoyed me at the Emirates was the abuse he recieved. A player of such clear quality, in a confidence crisis needs encouragement. What you really dont want to do is force him out or make him perform nervously and thus worse by getting at him. Beckford was a good example of this for us, the clear benefit crowd support can bring a player when lacking a bit of self confidence. Perhaps he needs abit of this at Goodison?

Regarding who I'd like to see come in, well we've brought in George McCartney on loan at LB from the Mackems as direct result of the 500-ish grand we raked in from the 1st leg, but we really do need a Centre Mid, a "Song" type if you want.

An enforcer who has a cool head and can pass, but most importantly sit and break up play - as you see we play very positively, sometimes leaving us open at the back. Amdy Faye didnt work out, so I'd like to see Michael Johnson from city on loan. Said he'd like to come and never going to break into City's 1st 11. He's a leeds fan. Can tackle and pass beautifully, and score a goal. Darren Pratley from Swansea's been bandied about, expires in summer there so we're apparantly trying to nick in there.

At CB we could do with strengthening. Woodgate may be a risk but the calibre is obviously there and he's available on loan. Don't have any ideas other than that currently at CB!

Apparantly we're after Stuart Parnaby, who's contract is up in summer to, and we have no real cover at RB so that would be nice.

Cheers for reading! And thanks alot for the compliments and comment

Anonymous said...

You're not pushovers and I'm very glad our manager DID take you seriously - if he hadn't you'd be progressing to the next round, not us.

Very good report. I too hope you guys get back into the PL - and that Stoke replace you in the Championship. You play good football. I prefer seeing the PL full of teams that play good football, not rugby. (and good football doesn't mean the kind that can't defend very well, which you certainly know how to do).

oliver said...

sean, unfortunately, he has gotten worse than the first leg from some of our home crowd. sadly, we have gotten a rep from that shameful incident involving manu (eboue) a few years ago. i agree he needs support and encouragement; but not everybody is willing to give it. that is reality at this moment in time. i think arshavin is a fairly strong character, but he is human, just like anyone else. if he can just get a goal, i think it will boost him to no end. same with chamakh, although i think his form is currently suffering for entirely different reasons.

best of luck in the player search. i think everyone would like a centre mid - including us. we have song, but as you can certainly infer, not many of us are happy about the depth behind him, particularly denilson and eastmond. so many of us have high hopes for emmanuel frimpong - but he got injured very early and has yet to feature for us this season. hopefully we'll see him sometime before this season is out and we'll get a better idea of just what we have.

we are also - allegedly - in the market for a cb. djourou and koscielny are our first-choice pairing of the moment, and they did very, very well last night - although i thought sagna's return was the real calming influence on our defence. jd and kos were also together at portman road, and did not play well. and jd had certainly his worst half of football this season at upton park this weekend. both matches featured eboue at rb, due to sagna's suspension. the latter returns and our defense looks confident and assured. i don't think i can overstate his importance to us - particularly as vermaelen has been out virtually the entire season. but we need another cb, certainly. vermaelen and jd would normally be our first choice, and our fourth choice squillaci is nursing his hammy - if something should happen to either jd or kos, we'll be in big trouble.

back to the future with woodgate, perhaps? i had heard that the spuds were willing to let him leave. is he not leeds through and through? i was always impressed by him - when he was fit - watching him in the leeds sides from 10-12 years ago.

good luck with everything. i'm looking forward to playing league matches at elland road from next season on...

oliver said...

one more quick thing, sean. you mentioned the twitter post talking about our football being out of this world. if that was meant as a condescending dig at lufc it is just plain wrong. and the fact of the matter is that our football can often be dreary and labored - witness two saturdays ago at the ems and the portman road leg. everything about our style, our setup, our business model is arsene - it is laudable in theory, but has yet to bear tangible fruit in the form of silverware. hopefully we are on the doorstep, but i think we still have lots more work to do before we can fulfill our true potential.

Sean said...

You are capable for sure of out of this world football, I just thought it odd for the official website to focus on such a comment when A) the football wasn't particularly mind blowing compared to what Arsenal have produced in the past and B) it was against Championship opposition.

Regards CB's i was impressed with Djourou in both legs - a rock, and saved a couple of very dangerous attacks from developing fully.

Regarding Woodgate - quality is undeniable. Injury is the issue, he'd be one of the best in england if he managed a good run fitness wise.

Regarding Arsenal in general, out of the top teams you are by far the most bearable, bar Walcott and Van Persie diving (v Wigan scoring from the resulting free kick was awful)... although that happens in the Prem. unfortunately... :(

I really don't know why Wenger doesn't spend. Last season you were in a fantastic position in Jan. If you splashed on a striker I thought you'd win the league. This year, if v. Persie stays fit, Arshavin regains a little form maybe and you buy a CB you have a very good chance. I really get annoyed at Wenger not spending. There's nothing worse than Chelsea or "Scum" winning because Wenger didn't spend. He's got to realise when to because you have been and are so close, not much is needed and with 15M perhaps - you can win the league and relieve a lot of pressure.

oliver said...

sean, good points - it feels like i am discussing this with a highbury/ems regular.

last point first, i was one of many clamoring for arsene to invest in a striker about 12 months ago. robin, bendtner, eduardo and vela were all out. i disagreed with playing arshavin up front alone - and i think we are still seeing some effects from that. the problem - as i see it - is that chamakh was his only target all along. while i do not agree with the assertion that arsene didn't make a move because he would have had to pay a transfer fee then vice none in the summer, i think he did not want to bring in chamkah just yet because he was cl cup tied: chamakh had already played for girondins bordeaux during that season's competition...

cb is another issue - i absolutely think he needs to bring someone in before jan 31st...and am absolutely convinced he won't. arsene's argument - one he has used in different previous situations - is that he does not see the need to invest unless he can get someone of superior quality to what we have in the squad. my counter to that is he is using oranges to argue against apples. i see this as a situation where we are in for cover - which to me, means someone that can come in, play if required, stay fit and ready. not necessary someone that will supplant jd in our starting eleven. if we bring cover in and that player never gets a minute of match action, it's not necessarily the end of the world. but if we persist with only two fit cb's and one goes down, that could be our season right there. song and sagna can both play as emergency centre backs, but i never like robbing peter to pay paul. the current deputies in each of those positions represent significant drop-offs in quality...it was only 5-6 years ago that arsene brought mart poom in as goalkeeping cover. he was with us for two years, and made only three-four appearances in total. so it can be done and this is an instance where i think it should be done.

Sean said...

I agree, there was that Chamakh speculation around at that point, and when available on a free, and he knew it then he was never going to shell out as he knew he could get what he saw a good enough striker for nothing.

And all good points on the CB situation, he needs to buy cover at the least. Vermaelan and Djourou will be quality for you lot when both fit. And I agree it won't happen. To be fair it is quite an excepional situation with Squllaci out aswell so maybe I see why Wenger is trying to ride it out without paying anything else.

It is frustrating to see (even for a Leeds fan, an "outsider" watching League One last season) that where Wenger has a chance to outlay a one off amount that will benefit the team long term he doesn't, even if it means they'd win a title short term. He can't keep waiting to build and make a challenge because the youth isn't coming along as quickly as he'd have hoped in some positions in the side im sure.

He runs the club correctly, I want us to be like that but surely he must be objective in some situations especially when so little changed/spent may win a title - which is a massive achievement. Surely he's in arrears monetarily....!?

Also, on a different matter, Szcezney should be your keeper. Out of the 3 he's impressed me most. For Brentford last season I saw this - and until we signed Schmeichel (who I never expected us to shell out for) I hoped we'd loan him... he was godly for the Bees against us and he's a very good keeper. Very tall, but still with fantastic reflexes. With experience and a little more command in the box, could be a Van Der Sar style keeper and of that quality aswell.

oliver said...

teenager ignasi miquel - whom we signed from la masia (barca) - is our depth at cb. he is tall and strong, and looks a great prospect, but is almost certainly not yet ready for this level of football. he was on the bench for the last few matches and there was speculation that he would start last night, but instead he featured in our fa youth cup fourth round tie (which we lost 2-1 at chelsea) earlier this evening. he is certainly a good prospect and one for the future, but i think asking him to step in for either jd or kos in a league fixture at say, anfield or st james, is a bit much at this point.

Sean said...

I know... I heard that and thought ahhh no Djourou, as I thought Wenger didn't want to play him twice a week?

oliver said...

sean, almunia is finished here. the third goal he let slip right through his hands in the home loss versus west brom sealed his fate - he has not even been named in the first team squad since. the more is see of szczesny, the more i am convinced he should be our first choice. but arsene is very, very loyal to fabianski and i expect the latter to reclaim the number one jersey when he is fit again. to be fair to fabianski, he has really turned it around from the wreck he was at the end of last season. i do think szczesny is our long-term number one. he is getting the run in the side he has been waiting for, and if he can just be a little more paitient, the number one jersey will be his sooner rather than later.

arsene is a visionary, and not always pragmatic. he is often stubborn and unyielding on certain things - not least of which is squad investments. our model certainly sets us up for long term success, but in some ways it ignores the short term. we are perpetually building for the future, but current success is an element that we lack - and an element that will also help down the road, provided we don't make any rash decisions. i think we are close - the league cup is set up almost perfectly for us - but this group of players does not yet know how to take that last, final step to winning a trophy. we cannot build on that until we accomplish it.

i don't think arsene does want to play jd twice a week, but i think he is also gambling that squillici will be available very soon. as cesc can tell all of us, a hammy is not something to gamble with...

great talking with you sean - i work in wash. dc and have to battle the dreaded metro dc traffic soon, so i'll sign off here. i will keep your blog in mind and try and visit after leeds matches. it would be nice to talk about leeds upcoming premiership season in a few months.

Sean said...

cheers mate, good to hear your views and all the best with the fighting on four fronts business this season.

Anonymous said...

"The mere fact they needed their big guns - bringing two World Cup finalists off the bench to see the game out and starting their form player, should be of slight concern to them, surely?"

Bizarre thing to say in anotherwise good read

Also slightly harsh to try and have a pop at the Arsenal fans when it's one of the least important matches they'll attend all season, yet the most important Leeds fans will, at least until the playoffs

Sean said...

I thought it should be of concern. Your second string is made up entirely of full internationals (or was at the Emirates) surely they have the ability themselves to put the game beyond a Championship side? Wenger feeling the need to use all of your big guns to seal the tie in the end, i thought may be of concern to you? Putting them at risk and showing he didn't feel comfortable that he could seal the game otherwise? Maybe im doing down our own credentials.

And maybe harsh yes, but Leeds fans set a precedent of sorts and away from home no matter where we go we are the same, Walsall on a Tuesday, Carlisle on a Tuesday etc etc, Histon in the cup, anywhere.. away ends sold out (sometimes to the point there's more Leeds than home fans) and fans supportive and loud.

Cheers for the comments by the way and cheers for reading!

Post a Comment