Friday, February 18

Leeds - Norwich City ... Preview

Leeds fans will have undoubtedly earmarked these last couple of weeks in February as crucial to proving our promotion credentials as we firstly aim to make more sure of a Play-Off place and possibly even push on into the top two. In three crucial outings between now and next Saturday, we face two direct promotion rivals in Norwich and Swansea, as well as what will be a tough contest in a local derby against Barnsley - who lets not forget hit five past us earlier this season at Oakwell.

This important three-game period begins tomorrow with Norwich visiting Elland Road in a tie that will no doubt be a hark back to last season's promotion race, and hopefully mirror the result we managed at Elland Road in the same fixture last year. Forster's slip and skewed pass to Beckford gifted Leeds the win, and brought Lambert to his knees. How Grayson and the Leeds faithful would like to see the stuffing knocked out of the Norwich boss again this season.

The promotion race is unquestionably wide open. The top six have all played the same amount of games, bar Forest who have one in hand. I was fully expecting Forest to beat Scunthorpe in midweek and go a point clear in second. Scunny managed the impossible though and ended Forest's twelve game unbeaten league record with a vital win. 2nd-6th position in the division is a span of merely 3 points, with QPR seemingly running away with it, 5 points clear at the top. Its tight, and we need to keep getting results. Leicester are waiting ominously in the wings should anyone in the Play-Off positions take their eye off the ball.

On the back of two wins and two clean sheets, then, we need to keep up the pressure, with at the very least no loss against either Norwich or Swansea, and ideally a win against Barnsley. Anything more will be outstanding for us, especially with the Swansea game being away from home.

In a similar vain to us, Norwich are also on a pretty good run winning eight of their last thirteen in the league. Further, one loss in their last 10, encompassing a win against table toppers QPR and a draw against Cardiff. Four wins since the turn of the year though and a tendency to struggle a little more on the road, their one win in the last four on the road against imploding Sheffield United at Bramall Lane. They have also failed to beat any of the current top half away from home this season... Any way you look at form however, this will be a tough game in front of 30,000 at Elland Road, with Grant Holt likely to be a thorn in the side to us again. Keeping tabs on him will be vital to our result. He's big, strong, powerful, good in the air, and a good finisher - he'll be their impetus going forward - Bruce and O'Brien need to be on form and can't give him a sniff. He's said this week: “We’ll worry about Elland Road now and rectify what happened there last year." He'll be making sure he does his best to put pay to that slip at Elland Road, and will be all the more of a threat for it.

Elland Road has turned into a recent asset to us once more, unbeaten in our last eight in the Championship. This can only be improved with 30,000 vociferous Yorkshiremen inside the ground.

Keeping concentration until the last will also prove crucial to us. Norwich have managed eight injury time goals, and have gained 16 points from 11 goals scored in the last ten minutes of games this season. This is a trait we have possessed ourselves at times, and our never say die attitude will have to be on display tomorrow.

In regards to our set up and what I'd like to see, I believe Simon will stick to the 4-5-1 that won last time out, and leave Somma on the bench to allow us to go to a 4-4-2 if we need to chase the game or go for the win in the last ten minutes. I can't see Simon changing the lineup, meaning Kilkenny stays, as does Lichaj at right back, who'll be keen to show a packed Elland Road what he's all about.

It is obviously crucial that we take advantage of Gradel and Snoddy's current confidence and form tomorrow. At every opportunity we should be looking to get the ball quickly to them out wide, so that they're able to break against a single player. If we don't move the ball quickly it's highly likely Lambert will have instructed doubling up on both of them. Incisive and quick passing will be vital if we're to try and catch them out defensively.

Last time out it was Gradel who scored, at the beginning of his current run of form - Becchio was the man felled in the box and the referee played advantage to allow Gradel to slot past Ruddy.

Prediction

Despite our last two games yielding clean sheets, I remain worried about conceding - after all Bristol and Coventry aren't the most prolific scorers or creative forces in the league. Norwich, Grant Holt, Hoolahan and Crofts will provide a threat and I believe we will concede. Our threat going forward is undeniable though. In a bid not to not tempt fate again, I'm saying:

Leeds 2-2 Norwich City

Team News

Leeds

Sanchez Watt should return to the bench after missing the past three with a hamstring problem.

Personally I think it'll stay 4-5-1 with Somma on the bench, meaning Kilkenny remains in the side.

Lichaj obviously remains in place of Connolly.

Norwich

Norwich are without influential defender Leon Barnett who's been ruled out for the rest of the season, after going off in their last outing against Reading. He scored their goal against us at Carrow Road in November. It should work to our advantage as disruption in a successful back four must surely have a negative impact on the Canaries defensive confidence.

Midfielder Surman could return to start after a lay off.

Key Contracts - Gradel & Snodgrass... Bradley Johnson attracting interest, again.

Gradel

Sky Sports News reported yesterday that Max has suspended his calls for a new contract after the club have failed to make him an offer. The article is today "not available" for some reason and I didn't understand it when I read it. It stated that Leeds were keen to offer Max a new deal, unsurprising given him taking to the Championship like a duck to water, and being a standout player this season. In the next sentence it told us that Leeds had not made an offer and Gradel had decided to suspend any talks:

"Skysports.com understands that rising star Max Gradel has put contract talks with Leeds United on hold until the summer.

Gradel had hoped to have his long-term future at Elland Road resolved this month so that he could focus his efforts on the pitch.

However, while Leeds were keen to offer fresh terms, an offer failed to arrive and now Gradel has put talks on hold."

If this is indeed the case it is baffling. If Max has suspended the talks because of us not making an offer and not because of any offer being no where near good enough then I don't know what to make of our contract policy. Have we not learned from Beckford, Becchio, Johnson, Kilkenny? When someone is clearly of the ability to play at this level why not even attempt to extend his contract - which I believe runs out in June 2012.

There is an argument that Gradel should be offered a new contract when we know what league we're in, and this is a fair point and one I'd largely agree with. The Sky Sports article in this case is redundant. There's always a risk the later we leave it though that his agent will be shopping around and seeing what could be on offer if anyone decided to make a move for Gradel in the summer, by which time an improved contract from us may not be able to match what may be available elsewhere.

Our record of sorting contracts out in the summer has of late also let us down. We got promoted last season and were told and expected the club to deal with players as we knew we could offer better terms in a higher league. We didn't deal with anyone until November and that was Somma. We finally then tied down Becchio but Kilkenny is hovering about in limbo regarding a contract and it would seem Johnson's agent is aware of (or is holding out for) higher wages elsewhere, as he had rejected our final offer, which was evidently not good enough.

Of course this is alleged and credibility to this rumour isn't helped by the article now being unavailable - but on past records of the clubs contract negotiations it's not all that unbelievable.

Snoddy

Leeds find themselves in a similar, if not even more pressing situation with Robert Snodgrass - although his contract is up in the summer of 2013. He's arguably our most prized of assets. Surely its worth our while to offer improved terms? He has previously stated his desire to stay at the club for the long term, and with Scottish club legends Gray and Lorimer still involved, he has persuasive voices to convince him his place is here. Not that he seems to need it. He said this past Monday:

“They gave me my chance down here."

“If the club ever wanted to get rid of me then that would be up to them but I’ve got a contract here and I’m staying put”

We can't run any risk of him leaving, however. He is pivotal to our successes and has been for a while. A player of such ability is a necessary component to make the step from our current league towards the top division. There are teams around us and teams that have gone up with players that are similarly pivotal - Charlie Adam was at Blackpool, Dorrans at West Brom for example and the likes of Bothroyd at Cardiff and McGugan at Forest. An article in today's YEP sees Dom Matteo stating that he's seen Liverpool and Manchester United scouts, among others at Elland Road on multiple occasions this season. If Snoddy remains without the draw of a higher paid contract, and without Premier League football at the end of this season, we could be struggling to retain him, and that really is worrying for us.

His performances internationally, in the league and most impressively against Premier League defenders in the cup have surely merited a step up in his earnings, it can't be argued against really. It would be devastating for the club not to retain him on a better contract and they should strike while the iron's hot and call Snoddy up on his public display of loyalty, putting to rest the risk of anybody coming in for him if we don't make the grade and go up. This way, if the worst happens, we'll get large compensation in the form of a transfer fee if a club does wish to make a raid and it would be harder to try and pry him away from an already handsomely paid contract. I'd echo what Dom Matteo has said:

"In my head, I can see clubs piling in if Leeds aren’t a Premier League side by the end of May. Promotion is their best defence against outside interest. Failing that, they must make sure their most vital players are contracted to the hilt. Every footballer has his price. In certain cases, that price should be set ridiculously high."

The presence of our club legends could be vital in keeping hold of one of the club's most talented players in recent years. Snodgrass said in 2009:

“This club doesn’t forget the legends who played here – they stick by their traditions."

“Eddie [Gray] and Peter [Lorimer] are still in and around Elland Road and I chat to them all the time."

“Gary [McAllister] was also great and told me all about the city and club. It feels great that I’m now part of that history at Leeds."

“That’s why I’m determined to help them get out of League One and back to the Premiership. We have stability now and the club is going in the right direction.”

Hopeful Snodgrass is a rare breed of loyal footballer, someone who genuinely feels indebted to the club and intent on leaving his mark.

Bradley Johnson

Ever since the beginning of his current contract saga with the club, and slight fall out with Bates, Johnson has proved his worth to the club in a position we could be thin on in the summer should he and Kilkenny leave. It baffles me if the club still deem he hasn't earned a raise (if his demands are within reason, obviously). I was not a Johnson fan in particular, but he has been worth his weight in gold since dropping into a deeper battling role in our 4-5-1 formation. Surely it would be cheaper and safer to offer Johnson new terms than source a replacement, who may or may not have Johnson's ability?

Sky Sports News is again reporting he has a few suitors when his contract is up. We know the club rejected a swap deal from Hull in January as well as at least one more offer that wasn't good enough. Now, West Brom and Forest have his card marked, following supposed interest from Stoke, Wigan and Bolton in the transfer window. All of the above are surely enticing to him as current bastions of footballing prowess... hopefully the sarcasm in that sentence shines through.

Bates and his long termism

Ken has come out on a few occasions stating his vision for Leeds United, which is a slow, measured building process on and off the pitch - very sensible and can't be argued against. Surely part of this however, is a continuity of our best assets on the pitch though? At the very least from a business sense, signing our prized assets onto long term, higher paying (where deserved) contracts, although at a short term increased cost, will yield greater rewards should they be bought, and if they stay, we're ensured quality on the field with the retention of our best players and thus there's no need to outlay anything to bring in replacements.

It makes no sense to me why the club lets our some of our key players run so close to leaving for nothing (Johnson, Kilkenny, Beckford, Becchio most notably) or run risk of teams possibly coming in and giving one of our players wind of what wage could be had elsewhere. Snodgrass is on a contract drawn up in League One, though no doubt with a clause for improvement of wage upon our Championship return. By the time summer comes Snodgrass or most likely his agent may not want to renegotiate if teams come sniffing around. Even the most loyal players (again, with heavy agent involvement) would have to consider a better offer if they got wind of it being available elsewhere - such is modern football.

The only explanation I can see for our tendency is if these players and their agents are awaiting an offer from the Premier League, to play at a higher level, for a fair bit more money - thus in our current situation we can't compete. Not even making an offer to a keen, highly talented player, however - as the Sky Sports News article on Gradel suggested is surely suicide in a business and a footballing sense?

A truly long termist view would see us try to retain at least those who are of a level of quality that is amongst the best in our current league and leaving talks until the summer may be too late. If a player at say Manchester United is on form, and deserving of improved terms, he is offered what he deserves - and usually on a very long term deal. This ensures that if they do come to have to sell, they get at least a good price. It is not often you see such a club let a key player willingly run within a year of his contract's end date. It is plausible that we can't afford such policy at this current time, though.

Obviously none of us know the ins and outs of how the club considers contracts but to me, from the outside, we seem to have a risky policy.

Bates to back Simon in loan window? Will Grayson get it right?

Ken Bates has this week told fans that Grayson is "authorised and encouraged" to strengthen United's squad ahead of the final push towards Championship promotion as the season heads towards its climax. The season has come in stages, with us first finding our level and wanting to be safe from the threat of relegation. After just a few games we realised this was the least we could expect as we more than held our own. Everyone's expectations kicked up a notch. Personally I said at the start of the season "10th, if we get a new centre-mid, centre back, and proven striker." We've managed 6th thus far without that centre-mid and now Bates is reaffirming his pre-season stance to club members and hopefully he'll further show that "we're not here to make up the numbers". 

The aim with a third of the season remaining is first to consolidate a playoff place, with Hull and Leicester looking menacing as they race up the table as the current form sides. This is priority number one, to give ourselves at least an outside chance - as we're pretty desperate when it comes to pressure games such as the playoffs. I believe that we can remain in this position without further addition, so hearing Simon has license to add to his squad gives me a little more confidence of us truly competing for that second automatic spot. All we need to see, then, is will Ken Bates truly put his money where his mouth is, and will Simon get it right? 

He said to the YEP:

“We’re doing well with 15 games to go and we’re in with a good chance. The manager is still authorised and encouraged to strengthen the team where he thinks is appropriate. At this time of year, good players and exceptional players are hard to find."

“As we’ve said many times before, there’s no point in signing players to make up the numbers.”

Bates backed Grayson last year, but Vokes and McSheffrey didn't cut the mustard, and would have come in on large wages. Further backing has seen Grayson bring in the likes of Collins and Bessone who've been no use. Luckily for us the club's recruitment policy does seem to bring in a sufficient number of gems (think Gradel, Becchio and Snodgrass) even if quality does come with a fair amount of chaff. Bringing in players on a smaller budget, aiming for a chance of a bargain is always going to have its risks, but currently the club's imports have performed well enough to let us forget about the ones that didn't work out all that well.

January failures? Not the clubs fault.

On the back of the additions of McCartney and O'Brien to the squad, who have both undoubtedly improved us, we saw no more significant addition throughout the much anticipated January window. With us sitting pretty in the table and cashing in with cup money I expected us to bring personnel in with a view to pushing on. We cleared out the remainder of deadwood in the squad, but the anticipated signings didn't materialise. 

This was not due to the failure of our policy. Simon came out and defended his and the club's actions in the window and assured fans that the players he was intent on bringing in were firstly not allowed to leave their clubs temporarily - as Premier League clubs aimed to permanently offload their periphery players to cash in. Realistically, we can't expect to find players of higher class than we currently possess to come in on a budget whilst their parent clubs seek to cash in. We rely on loans because of inflated Premier League wages, and can no doubt only dream of paying the inflated asking prices of players whose clubs want rid of.

City's Johnson

The second reason of our perceived failure was the unwillingness of Manchester City to let Michael Johnson join on loan due to them seeing him as unfit for matches at the time was inquired. Simon has coyly stated that "you'd have to see" if the club would be interested if Johnson was made available in the emergency window. He sent scouts to look at Johnson the other week as he played 80 minutes for City's reserves. We are interested, make no mistake. 

Saturday the 26th...

I believe this is the magic date we should be looking at for any incoming loans. If we bring anybody in on emergency loan then they'd have to come in on this date, or later, to be able to compete in any possible Play-Off campaign upto and including an appearance in the final (emergency loans can last a maximum of 93 days). Clubs will now be willing to cut their losses and receive whatever they can get for those they failed to ship out permanently in January, and we should therefore see a face or two - if Simon still wants to add, as he did two weeks ago during the window. Eric Lichaj has provided the necessary cover at right back by coming in - and can be at the club a further two months beyond his initial month's loan. So, the only piece of the jigsaw that I think Simon, and the fans, will be looking at will be that centre midfielder. The "better Kilkenny" seems to be what we're after, and Michael Johnson seems to be where we're looking.

Thursday, February 17

What Bates said... 17th Feb 2011

Ben Fry: First up, the FA Youth Cup. Defeat last night against Aston Villa but only two goals conceded in the last 10 minutes, a valiant display and you must be encouraged by the team’s progress this year?


Ken Bates: Well, I am rather pleased because you know, we had a situation where we weren’t very happy with the situation at the academy, we seemed to have faltered a bit and the conveyor-belt had slowed down and so on a so forth. Of course, at one time, we were bottom of the Under-18s league which was nothing short of a disgrace but things have turned around. To lose against a strong Aston Villa team was no disgrace particularly, as you say we only conceded in the last 10 minutes, but the team now are on a good run and it looks as though there are happy times again. We are very pleased about that because the academy is our tomorrow and we have to fight hard for that with the proposed changes coming from the Premier League.


BF: Now you mentioned that the results have been improved, so I suppose last night rather than being disappointed, do you think they should use it as a learning curve to kick on for the rest of the season?


KB: Oh, of course, whenever you play against a team which is better than you and Premiership quality, that’s how you do learn to improve because you see what your shortcomings are and you can see where your weaknesses are and what you have to concentrate on to improve. So it should be a very good lesson to our youngsters to see how much they have got to work on their game to be successful in their chosen profession.


BF: Now back to first team matters and back-to-back wins with a 2-0 win at Aston Gate. Back-to-back wins, back-to-back clean sheets – at this stage of the season, any time you can put that sequence together really does make a huge difference doesn’t it?

KB: Well, it’s looking very good. I must say, our weakness has been at the back all season. We have conceded far too many goals and now it seems we have stopped that rot. This time last year, after the Manchester United and Tottenham games, we collapsed a bit. It hasn’t happened this year, we’re doing well. Too many draws but we still have 15 games to go. Cardiff City dropped two points last night, which is good for us. We’re only three points behind promotion, although we have got to improve our goal difference but we’ll keep doing that if we keep clean sheets and I think we’re in for a good run. Of course, the manager is still authorised and encouraged to strengthen the team where he thinks it’s appropriate. But of course, at this time of the year, good players, exceptional players, are hard to find. As I’ve said many times before, there’s no point in signing more players just to make up the numbers.


BF: Now one player who is shining at the moment is Robert Snodgrass. He made his international debut for Scotland and then scores a wonder goal at the weekend. Since he has arrived from Livingston, you must be delighted with his progress.


KB: Very pleased indeed. In fact, we actually took him from under the noses of MK Dons who made public their interest in him so we had a quick look and took him from under their noses. The selling club was hard-up at the time and we did them a better cash deal. So that’s proved to be a very valuable purchase. It just goes to show to those fans who sometimes moan that we don’t splash the cash that we believe in value for money. Snoddy is a perfect example of that. He has matured so much in the last six or seven months. I can’t believe it. And he and Gradel, Mad Max as I call him affectionately, must be two of the most potent wingers in the league at the moment.


BF: As we approach next season, the club have announced a new package for the Bremner suite. What changes are you making for next season?


KB: We have always been short of hospitality packages and Bremner as you know, we’ve spent a lot of money upgrading it. We have improved the whole setup. It used to have a split level floor but we have raised it so it is on a level, which is far better and indeed at my age , far safer. But the real problem is, because of the antiquated layout of the West Stand there is always a difficulty getting people from Bremner from a meal to their seats. And of course, with the redevelopment of the East Stand next season we will have over 1,000 more hospitality capacity. So we decided to change Bremner somewhat into a almost a halfway house. It’s a enhanced ordinary season ticket. It’s not a full hospitality package. It’ll be basically a bar serving snack food but it means also that our fans can of course eat somewhere else, maybe Howard’s, come in and have a place to relax before they go to their seats. I think it’s a good idea. We’re trying it out and in fact we’ve already sold 75 since we put it on sale this week. So that’s very good… season tickets, that’s good, we’re very pleased about that.


BF: Whilst you mention tickets, can you give us an update on the crowd for Saturday. It does, it’s another cliche, but it’s a six-pointer.


KB: Of course, it is a six-pointer. This is the definitive six-pointer. If we beat Norwich we go above them. It’s as simple as that. As of last night, we had 29,386 tickets sold, including over 1,000 hospitality packages. So this is now Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday… I think we can look comfortably at 31,000 to 32,0000 which is great. Very welcome extra money which can pay the players’ bonuses.


BF: With Norwich coming up from League One with Leeds last season, why do you think both teams have managed to do so well in this division?


KB: Well basically because basically they have both got good teams and good managers. Lambert, if you remember, was at Colchester at the beginning of last season. He took them to Norwich and beat them 7-1 at Carrow Road. So they promptly nicked him from Colchester on a Sunday appointed him as manager on the Monday and he has never looked back since. They’re a good team. Good club, well run, even do good Steak and Kidney pie I’m told. Probably because Delia Smith is on the board. On the other hand, we are serving Steak and Kidney pie on Saturday. It’ll be the battle of the chefs. We of course have a good manager, a good team, good ground and again we are being run carefully and wisely. It will be great and of course, great supporters. It would be rather nice if we both got promotion this year. Us automatically, them through the play-offs.


BF: Now talking of winning, there was some success for Elland Road at the BAFTAs at the weekend. A part of The King’s Speech was filmed on location at Elland Road by the same director who made The Damned United. Were you cheering the film on to success at the weekend?


KB: No I wasn’t actually. I was cheering Leeds United on to win at the weekend. Seems that we now have overkill. There has been awards on twice a week for the last month, I think. Most people are getting sick of them. I thought it was rather bittersweet that the guy said he chose Elland Road because the West Stand was the nearest thing to the old Wembley he could find. Not quite sure what I made of that. I suggest we have to look at the West Stand even more, what we can do to improve it. We are, basically, a football club and all the awards are welcome but are peripheral to main drive – successful football club and Premiership football.


BF: Now one issue that the FA have brought up this week is revamping the FA Cup, as attendances drop 30% in the last four years. Some of the proposals include a 5.30pm kick off for the final, no replays, midweek games and seeding the teams. Would you like to see the competition restructured?


KB: There’s nothing wrong with the competition. And the trouble is, once again, you have got somebody at the FA coming up with these ideas who has no idea. I don’t think think he is football man, I’d be very surprised if he is, and if you look at the proposals how they are going to improve it? Let’s take the simple one, first of all, I challenge the fact that it’s a concern that the FA Cup attendances have dropped 30%. It’s very much the luck of the draw. You take this year, two teams have played at home who are Torquay and Crawley. I think Crawley had 4,000 and Torquay had 8,000. Now at the same time, a lot of big clubs seem to have played away. So, the whole thing about the FA Cup is it’s very dramatic and it’s very uncertain. The phrase ‘the luck of the draw’, I’m sure came from the FA Cup. That’s the first thing. Secondly, the FA are their own worst enemy because by bowing to TV you are going to get midday kick-offs, 5.20pm kick-offs, matches on Sunday, matches on Monday night, so the excitement of 32 matches happening all at the same time, that’s gone. The FA have done that. They have done it themselves. And a 5.30pm kick-off for the final – how is that going to improve the game? How is it going to make the FA Cup more exciting? It’s not. It’s another sell-out to TV. The TV companies have said ‘well we’d like a 5.20pm kick-off because we get more people than during the day’ but the reverse of it is, for the 90,000 people who are going to Wembley, you are destroying their Sunday. A 5.20pm kick-off means that by the time the game has finished and the presentations are done, it’s now 8 o’clock rather than 7 o’clock. So, if you’re planning to go out for the night, you can forget it. They are just trying to raise money. No replays – why not? The great thing about the replays is that it gives people a second chance. It gives the away club a chance to even up the advantage that the away club had in the first leg. No replays is nothing to do with ramping up the FA Cup, it’s as a sop to FIFA and UEFA because there is too many bloody international friendlies being played. Useless, pointless, friendlies being played so the domestic game is being squeezed and squeezed and squeezed far more. As for seeding the teams, oh… is it going to be the FA Cup or is it not going to be the FA Cup? If they seed the teams, then you may as well forget the thing. The results will be predictable until the fifth round. What’s the point? We might as well go and play tiddlywinks. The FA need their new main sponsor to see what they can offer but they have to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water.


BF: Finally, can you bring us up to date with the news on season ticket sales and memberships?


KB: Yeah, I’m delighted to say, that season tickets are now over 35% being renewed, taking advantage of the earlybird discount. Although we only put the corporate hospitality packages on sale this week, we have already done 20% of what it was last year. It’s quite fantastic. I’m just very pleased. Obviously, the support and encouragement the club is getting from the fans who are getting about the club. There’s a great buzz about Leeds and Elland Road around the city and long may it continue. Finally, our memberships for this year are now just over 39,000. So they’re very nice these figures. Well done everybody. Thank you everybody. Let’s make this last push to get us to where we want to be.

Courtesy of WACCOE and TSB's Fax Man @ TheSquareBall

Sunday, February 13

Bristol City 0-2 Leeds ... sensational Snoddy can't be contained as Leeds class does for Bristol City

All the talk before the game was about what Simon would do with the formation. Revert to the currently more successful 4-2-3-1 or return to the 4-4-2 which was victorious last time out while also giving a clean sheet. It was expected that he'd go back to the 4-5-1 given Somma's international involvement in South Africa, and that's just what Grayson did - it continues to be a formation that keeps Leeds pulses racing, especially with the form of the deadly Gradel and Snodgrass.

All the talk after the game was about Snodgrass. Quite rightly, as he made a third performance in a week that made the players dealing with his threat seem rather silly. Snoddy carried his impressive 30 minute performance from Wednesday's Scotland international into Ashton Gate and Jamie McAllister must have been dreading the prospect of facing him. His goal was taken with such poise that comparisons were drawn to Eddie Gray's audacious goal against Burnley all those years ago - such was its class. Poise, confidence, technique, composure and it made those defending it look bamboozled as he passed it into the back of the net. This comparison was by no means anyone getting ahead of themselves - at this level and in this form, Snodgrass is showing such talent that people are beginning to believe he can go on to greatness at a higher level, and hopefully that is by taking Leeds with him.

The performance was good, another one similar to the Coventry performance. Looking back at Cov. with the Bristol performance in mind pleases me immensely, as with the 4-4-2 that day we managed a similar level of solidity and created a similar amount - both have to be pleasing for Leeds fans, as we could have two very good options regarding our setup, if I'm not speaking a little prematurely about the success of the 4-4-2.

It was by no means a clear cut Leeds domination though. Bristol had several clear cut chances, and in one instance managed to ping the post and crossbar in succession, after smashing a shot directly at Schmeichel, who was scrabbling around on the floor after an attempted save.
 


The game

Onto the match itself then. We saw Kilkenny returning to his deep lying central midfield role in place of Davide Somma - who was rested to the bench after international duty. Paul Connolly suffered an injury last week against Coventry and his replacement, who joined on loan for a month this week was Eric Lichaj. Becchio was thus allowed to return to his favoured role, and most profitable in terms of goals scored.

The game started in a bitty and broken up way and for the majority of the 90, this described the game well. A half chance for Kilkenny who shot from 25 yards and a good headed opportunity for Keogh who evaded the marking but also the goal, heading it wide when he should have done better. He said pre-match he had nothing to prove to us, which is true really. He wasn't doing anything to prove we were wrong in letting him go, though.

It was Snoddy who saw the best of our attacking play during the first quarter of an hour. Running at McAllister proved an easy task, as he was allowed to provide a ball into the box, albeit too long for Becchio or Gradel to sweep up. Eric Lichaj also performed well in the opening few minutes. He proved solid and no nonsense at the back and had a fair amount of pace. A ball through to Snodgrass for that cross showed an early understanding with the Scot which could be crucial during Connolly's absence - we all know how effective Connolly is when linking up with Snodgrass. 

The goal on seventeen minutes was nothing short of magic from Snodgrass. Gradel provided the incisive ball from a central position to Snoddy who was around the penalty spot. Robert managed to juggle the ball from left to right foot to go round one, before stopping on his left, right side to goal. He then dragged the ball back with the sole of his left foot to fool another and simply passed the ball past David James into the bottom corner. It was the least he deserved this week, after three fantastic performances. This is the quality Leeds possess just now, the ability of one individual to do something that puts us ahead - in what was a game without any flow. Minutes later, Snoddy had a drive from distance parried round by James who couldn't hold it.

The game continued in its mainly uninteresting way for the remainder of the first half, with Bristol having the only other notable chance when Elliott put a shot into the side netting from six yards having turned full circle to get the strike away. The Leeds defence had thus far proved solid, with Bruce and debutant Lichaj impressing in particular.

Bristol's main spell of pressure at the end of the first half was thankfully due to long ball play, this is what Leeds fans would prefer to see coming at us, rather than anyone running at our defence directly. This was also a testament to the way in which we managed to contain their attacks with our midfield numbers and solid defending.

Bristol came out in the second half the better of the two sides and a shot into the side netting where perhaps they should have done better was a bit of a let off for Leeds - who then went on to make it 2-0 on 50 minutes. Snoddy was allowed to stroll in from the flank with no real resistance and drilled a shot at James, where he may have been better placed to pull the ball back. The loose ball fell to Gradel with three men and David James in his way of the near post. Some quick feet and a snapshot on the turn put the ball round the defenders and laughably through James' legs - who received the taunts of the Leeds fans. "David James is F****** Shit"...

Snoddy was again instrumental in fashioning another opening. He ran body open, teasing McAllister as to which way he'd go, he wrapped his left around the ball and ran outside of the defender - looping a cross over with his right - which was met by Bradley Johnson's head - it was a little high though for Johnson to meet effectively, and the ball skewed narrowly over the bar.

Gradel had a great chance when released through on goal by Howson but unusually for him in current form, he managed to lift the ball over the bar. 

Following this, Bristol had a large spell of pressure that Leeds needed to deal with, and thankfully went into with a two goal advantage. This was in no small part due to Leeds failing to get the ball out to Snodgrass anything like as often as we'd managed earlier. This does happen in games, inexplicably. Even though we know how much of a threat Snoddy is, for extended periods in some games we fail to just play it out to him and let him do his thing. This could have been tactical, if we'd decided with about 20 minutes remaining to hold back a little in a bid to ensure the three points. I don't think this was the case however, as we brought Somma and McCormack on later in the game - surely if the tactical decision was made to hold back then we'd have brought a defender or midfielder on? This sporadic inability to play to our strengths in games really does frustrate sometimes.

Schmeichel was called into action to produce game saving stops on a couple of occasions. The best was a second save in a few minutes as he reeled out the Schmeichel star jump to deny Bristol from a matter of yards - what a stop - again he provides an important and vital contribution at an important moment. The next piece of Bristol attacking play left everyone wondering how the ball hadn't been hit home. The ball looped over Schmeichel onto the far post in the first portion of this scramble, then the ball was smashed against the prone Schmeichel who'd just dived and finally the rebound fell to Marvin Elliott who hammered the ball against the underside of the bar from the penalty spot. We breathed a collective sigh of relief as the ball was whelked upfield.

Bristol's introduction of Albert Adomah on the right wing and Nicky Maynard's first appearance of the season lifted both the Bristol players and their fans inside Ashton Gate. Much of the attacking came down their right flank directly at McCartney - Adomah was highly effective at getting the better of George and it was left to Bruce to be an unsung hero at the back by providing several trademark flying blocks to prevent the ball getting into the danger area. It would have been better to see Leeds cutting out the crosses at source rather than give them any chance to be a danger.

O'Brien, Bruce and Schmeichel provided key contributions at the back with blocks, headers and Kasper rushing out at the feet of defenders when necessary - it's pleasing to see the key three in the defence working in harmony at last. Despite the desperate nature of our defending, it seemed to do the trick, with perhaps a little luck. On the whole though we did deserve to come out winners, although again it wasn't as clear cut as some sources made out and as the chances, possession and corners showed. We just had more talent available to convert where necessary. 

The players

The defensive unit again proved solid. This time with five midfielders in front of it. It was by no means all conquering though. McCartney seemed to be the player that was singled out by Bristol, perhaps due to the introduction of Adomah late on - his direct running and bits of trickery seemed to cause problems for our left back, who ended up allowing several balls into the box. Thankfully though, Bruce at left centre back provided the tonic for McCartney's problems with Adomah - with key blocks and headers preventing the development of further danger. McCartney provided his usual presence upfield linking up with Gradel well though. 

Lichaj impressed in his debut. There will be bigger tests of him to come, as Bristol didn't offer an awful lot going forward on his flank, but he proved capable and proved some doubters wrong. He looks so far a good step in for Connolly - with  perhaps even the ability to challenge the place of probably this season's most convincing defender for us. He has good pace and is pleasingly no nonsense, with the ability to link up nicely with Snoddy as he showed in his first Leeds outing. The understanding between the two can only improve with time and its vital he fulfills this role as Connolly excels in support of Snodgrass.

The relationship between Bruce, O'Brien and Schmeichel was pleasing. Consistency has allowed this solidity - and even when defending desperately, they kept cool and proved resilient in the end. Schmeichel provided one or two key saves, as he always does, but he is worrying me with his reluctancy to come and claim. His punches tend to be good, but there are times when they fail to convince with distance or accuracy - and can cause us issues. Bruce at times failed to head clear, and on a couple of occasions the distance on his header clear was about five metres, again, causing issues on a couple of occasions.

In midfield, it was another assured performance from Howson, the creative force behind a Gradel run on goal and will flourish in his return to the in the hole role. Johnson was again at home, doing everything required an also being allowed to bomb on by the presence of Kilkenny deeper, and nearly profited with a header. Neil Kilkenny's return will no doubt be of reassurance to many and he did nothing wrong worth speaking of. He passed well and incisively and used his brain to dictate play on occasions. No one could have substantiated complaints at any of the midfield three. 

It was the wingers that again proved key to our win - this time, both of them got on the score sheet. They must be at this moment the two most effective wingers in the division. They're creative - providing a host of chances for us per game, and also deadly - Snoddy has taken his tally to seven whilst Gradel has scored ten. Defenders simply can't cope with them. Its a joy to watch. In 4-4-2 or 4-5-1 they seem equally effective and its a long time since we've had proper wingers at the club. Even 10 years ago, we'd use Gary Kelly out wide, Bowyer as well and other makeshift wide men. Not out and out wingers. Particularly since our fall out of the Premier League I can't remember one effective winger. The nearest to a good one was Eddie Lewis who was acceptably good but could produce nothing like our current crop can. Gradel and Snoddy always make you think they are going to produce when they have the ball at their feet. Sam and Watt are a cut above too, most teams would kill to have such backup on the bench.

Luciano did OK. He held the ball up well, challenged in the air, but was lacking in efforts on goal - mainly due to a lack of service directly to him. Most of the time we attacked out wide with the intention of beating men and running into the box, so Luciano wasn't as "required" as an outlet as he usually is. His game suits this formation though, and he's a key component to it working. Davide came on for him and did OK as well, although miraculously not scoring!

Grayson

"Bristol City had some chances and we had to make some last-ditch challenges so it was great credit to the lads that they kept a clean sheet."

"A lot of clubs still fancy their chances of automatic promotion in the Championship."

"We don't look at other results too closely, but will go on doing our jobs and see where that takes us."

On Snoddy

"It has been a huge week for Robert, with his first game for Scotland and now this excellent performance."

"He is a lad who deserves everything that comes his way because he works so hard at his game."

"In the 92nd minute today he was still closing down Bristol City's full-back and playing his part for the team.

"Max Gradel is a similar type of player on our other wing and he also took his goal well and played a major role in our victory."

The Support

Our support were wrongly attributed to police intervention during the game, which was in fact to take about four Bristol City fans our of the ground, on their side of the segregation. Other than that, there were a lot of Leeds fans in their sections sparking off chants of "town full of Leeds fans" which brought a laugh.  

Man of the Match

It has to be Snodgrass. He was unbelievable, and our key threat - and the goal was just magic.

Friday, February 11

What Grayson Said ... YR White Hot News - 10th Feb 2011

Simon sheds light on the Michael Johnson saga, which sounds hopeful once more after a deal seemed dead. There are also comments on International involvement from our players, reaction to Eric Lichaj arriving and comments on Howson's involvement in the U21's.

Cheers to YR and Thom Kirwin who provided the interview on Thursday.








Personally, Grayson is seemingly in no rush to try and improve our current squad. As long as we do end up moving to improve in the later weeks of the month in a bid to strengthen while allowing incoming players to be involved in the play-offs I'll be happy with that. If we don't bring anyone in I'd be very surprised as we scouted Johnson again last week - who is only unavailable due to City feeling he's still not fully fit but played another 80 minutes for their reserves. Despite our current squad being good, and there indeed being no current rush as they're all available for selection (bar Connolly and Paddy) - improvement and strengthening for a run-in push can't be turned down from where we currently find ourselves this season, especially considering the trimming of our squad that occurred in January.